Revista OEconomica

Raluca-Georgiana ROBU, Maria GHEORGHE (NIŢU), Valentin COJANU, Alexia-Maria POPESCU - Between Opportunity and Dependency: The Evolution of Romania’s Trade with Asian Economies [Între oportunitate şi dependenţă: evoluţia comerţului României cu economiile asiatice]

Narciz BĂLĂŞOIU, Octavian-Dragomir JORA, Răzvan Marian PÎRCĂLĂBESCU - Romania’s Positioning and Room for Manoeuvre: The Dilemmas of Peripheral Adaptation in the New Indo-Pacific [Poziţionarea şi marjele de manevră ale României: dilemele adaptării periferice în noul Indo-Pacific]

Mădălina JURUBIțĂ - Redefining EU Trade Policy for an Age of Geoeconomic Rivalry: Strategic Autonomy, Security, and Resilience

Geicun MUSTAFA - Islamophobia as an Informal Trade Barrier: Reputational Risk and the Political Economy of Deglobalization

Hesam JEBELI-BAKHT-ARA - Racialized Capitalism and Economic Discrimination: The Case of Ethnic Labour Segmentation in Contemporary Europe

Articles on Issue Theme

Silviu CERNA

Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara

The global crisis brought about the revival of a debate almost as old as economics itself: the relationship between the State and the market. From W. Petty, F. Quesnay and A. Smith to J. M. Keynes, L. von Mises, F. Hayek and M. Friedman, all the great economists of the world expressed their opinion regarding this important subject. Without detailing the argumentation of various positions, it can be said that there are five main doctrinal orientations, with as many corresponding forms of political action – classical liberalism, welfare state, Keynesianism, direct interventionism, neo-liberalism – each expressing a certain attitude towards State presence in the economy, whether or not the latter is facing a crisis, such as the present global one, or not.

ŒCONOMICA no. 1/2010

Keywords: free market, State interventionism, economic crisis, financial regulations

JEL: G01, P51

Criza şi reglementările financiare

Select Issue: